Fantastic, LOL wouldn't be surprised if they left out his battery deliberately...
Some thoughts on their cell - why the need for dissimilar metals if not to act as cathode and anode relative to an electrolyte? IOW, if the electret's chemically inert then WHAT OTHER benefit might there be to the "dissimilarity" of the metal poles? Presumably, the answer lies in the sense in which metals are most meaningfully "dissimilar" - which has to be... charge density. One plate has more free charge than the other. So, why would that matter if not to act as donor and recepticle in an ionising reaction? But then we recall from Orbo theory that propgation rates are inversely proportional to field densities! Which leads to some interesting speculations such as transient current differentials between poles... But perhaps the most simple effect of dissimilar native charge densities would be in polarising the dielectric between them - if the upper plate had higher charge density then it's top-negative, but internal electrostatic repulsion would leave the dielectric charge separation polarised in the opposite direction, top-positive, with the dielectric's charge bunched up towards the lower charge density of the lower plate. So it would be interesting to note the polarisation of the electret relative to that of the intrinsic charge density difference between the plates. Same direction, or opposite? The preferential properties of their electret material can also be implied from first principles - for instance, a highly polar "domain" molecule, interspersed with a non-mixing elastic base. It might be quite simple to begin reverse engineering... What bothers me about the dissimilar metals thing is their insistance this remains "classic Orbo" - ie. energy from a force/time delta. Which means the dissimilarity of the metals must be doing something more than merely anchoring the charge separation - if the system is still dependent on passive time-dependent force variations, as they seem to be claiming, then they're alluding to a free charge separation that is a function differing or changing current velocities. Classic PM Orbo depended on asymmetric rates of increasing vs decreasing B for a given mechanical velocity. Making a direct like-for-like substitution of magnetic flux for charge, implies asymmetric rates of charge and discharge for electrons entering and leaving the cell, due to spending slightly longer in limbo when transiting though one plate relative to the other - a transient charge separation, but hence an EMF nonetheless, Rank speculation of course, but there's some testable hypotheses here.. On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Mats Lewan <[email protected]> wrote: > Check it out: Test undertaken by Frank Acland at E-Cat World: > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/02/09/ecw-orbo-o-cube-testing-week-1-feb-9/ > > Mats > www.animpossibleinvention.com > > > >
