Russ, Agreed, I was thinking the same thing, even LENR may be a good detector, The EM drive is by design inefficient - only a small fraction of the microwave energy is linked in an unbalanced manner to the spatial axis, Shawyer and I both think this is relativistic in the same way that Jan Naudts thinks the Mills hydrino is relativistic. In the case of nano geometry there is less organization so we create a self assembled demon with condensed hydrogen ions that creates heat where as Shawyer concentrates on accumulating a spatial bias by linking reactionary forces between different inertial frames [the thought being that standing waves can segregate vacuum density similar to Casimir suppression and the dissimilar geometry of his trapezoid can unbalance the radiation pressure against the walls such that some tiny fraction of equal and opposite forces are instead divided between different inertial frames. Since the EM isn't trying to extract energy from the medium it can afford to be very inefficient - it offers a path to reactionless drive. IMHO these inertial frames in the EM are far less relativistic then what hydrogen experiences in the Mills or Rossi catalysts but may become more potent by adapting a hybrid scheme of reactor and drive geometry and materials. Off the top of my head I suspect that micro trapezoid EMS all aligned would be more efficient in a sort of tip of the hat to Difiore et all the "driven" system might flush out what they were seeking with stacked Casimir cavities. I don't know if there is any way to employ the hydrogen and nano powders without destroying any spatial bias to the system but maybe someone else with a higher pay grade could suggest? Getting back to LIGO I think this also tells us something wrt the Michaelson Morley experiment and why there is no detection of a spatial bias to the ether.. because Virtual particles are traveling 90 degrees to all spatial axis and changes in rate of this intersection can only be detected via differential measurement[paradox twins]
Fran From: Russ George [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 12:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:EM drive actually a GW drive? Given what the methods and discovery of LIGO teach is it likely that the EM drive is in fact a GW drive and thus an immediate realization of some utility of GW. If so then Shawyer's 'GW detector' has far outdone LIGO.
