Some of the heat inside the Earth is left over from its formation. The
remaining heat is thought to be generated by radioactive decay, however, I
remember reading somewhere that the actual particle flux due to radioactive
decay is less than what is required. I am not sure if this discrepancy has
been explained yet.

Harry

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> Unless science understands how LENR produces heat inside planets, they
> will be faced with mounting numbers of unsolvable cosmological conundrums.
>
> Scientists shocked to find Mercury has liquid metal core and a magnetic
> field like Earth
> MAY 13, 2015 BY DAN TAYLOR
>
> Scientists shocked to find Mercury has liquid metal core and a magnetic
> field like Earth
>
> NASA's MESSENGER spacecraft smashed into the planet's surface on April 30
> after four years in orbit, but not before sending back some amazing data.
>
> Scientists were floored recently after getting back data from NASA’s
> MESSENGER space probe that showed that Mercury has a core filled with
> sloshing liquid metal, much like Earth — and they’re scratching their heads
> as to how that’s possible.
>
> Mercury had been thought to be too small to have a liquid core, as
> scientists believed the metal would have cooled relatively quickly in its
> history, but the MESSENGER space probe sent back data before slamming into
> the planet on April 30 that indicated that yes, its core still contains
> molten metal, and that metal is creating a magnetic field similar to that
> of Earth, according to a Space.com report.
>
> It’s nowhere near as powerful — scientists estimate that it is 100 times
> weaker than Earth’s. But the findings still surprised scientists who
> thought they would find a solid rock core much like the other rocky planets
> in our solar system. The findings shed new light on the evolution of
> Mercury, the closest planet to the sun and the smallest planet in the solar
> system, and will force scientists to rethink how it developed.
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It has proven for the first time that the deepest part of the lunar
>> mantle is soft, based upon the agreement between observation results and
>> the theoretical calculations.
>> The research team also clarified that heat is efficiently generated by
>> the tides in the soft part, deepest in the mantle.
>>
>> In general, a part of the energy stored inside a celestial body by tidal
>> forces (caused by being pushed and pulled by its partner, in this case
>> Earth, as it orbits) is changed to heat.
>> The heat generation depends on the softness of the interior.
>>
>> Whereas previous research also suggests that some part of the energy
>> inside the moon due to the tidal forces is changed to heat, the present
>> research indicates that this type of energy conversion does not uniformly
>> occur in the entire moon, but only intensively in a soft layer.
>> The research team believes that the soft layer is now warming the core of
>> the moon as the core seems to be wrapped by the layer, which is located in
>> the deepest part of the mantle, and which efficiently generates heat.
>>
>> They also expect that a soft layer like this may efficiently have warmed
>> the core in the past as well.
>>
>>
>> Read more:
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2719809/Is-moon-s-core-MOLTEN-Centre-satellite-wrapped-layer-soft-rock-claim-scientists.html#ixzz40SvO0v6m
>>
>>
>> The moon's core could well be heated by cold fusion. The assumptions made
>> about the moons molten core sound far fetched. A soft layer would not has
>> formed when the moon cooled. All less dense stuff would have risen upward
>> during the cooling process.
>>
>> Without cold fusion science does not make sense.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Good surprises are necessary.
>>>
>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/02/feb-17-2016-lenr-sacred-cow-candidates.html
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Peter
>>> --
>>> Dr. Peter Gluck
>>> Cluj, Romania
>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to