But the main frequency is invisible we only see the tail here what the peak is in the invisible range of this instrument. We simply don't know the magnitude of the radiation energy. But I agree that it is way to early to call this a success. It is an interesting lead and it should be repeated.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Well - OK... there is a tiny signal - but let's look at the counts per > minute or per second. > > We are talking about 20 per second or so instead of a background of 4 or > so. This is really "banana level" (bananas are slightly radioactive). > > You would need to see trillions of times this level if there was 5 hours > of SSM - being produced by nuclear fusion. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: H LV > > from > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OAcb975m_AXMFz25zcl07kllERqVjSbZsWv_P1A3xQc/edit?pref=2&pli=1 > Bob Higgins writes: > "There was a significant gamma outburst measured in GS5.2 whose broadband > high energy spectrum is not only unexplainable by known chemistry and > physics, but may also not be explainable by many of the present theories > for LENR!" > > He also says the the spectrum on figure 6 probably continues to rise on > the left side but it drops off due to the detector's sensitivity limit. > > Harry > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Roarty, Francis X < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Yes a little underwhelming but if they truly have a hands down recipe > > to repeatable anomalous heat it will probably get a number of industry > > labs and their funding off the fence wrt LENR. Now researchers can > > prove to their management this is real. > > > > Fran > > > > From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:44 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ? > > > > > > > > Where is the big surprise? > > > > I woke this morning with anticipation - expecting to see proof from > > MFMP of a 5 hour self-sustained reaction. Instead, we get graphs of > > modest gain at the noise level and radiation counts peaking in the few > > hundred per second – when we need to seeing a million times more - if > > the radiation does indeed relate to excess heat at kilowatt level. > > Yawn. Let’s hope there is much more forthcoming than this. > > > > What am I missing? > >
