Also if Bob higgins and MFMP could determine how the curve continues to rise at lower energies then they could use it to calculate the "excess heat". This method would be far more sensitive than bulk calorimetry.
Harry On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:16 AM, H LV <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Why can't the peak be at 100eV or 10eV and many order of magnitude more >> intense. > > Yes. > >>There is not much in the shown signal >> that indicates a peak in teh extreme spectra near the seen peak in the >> background. I think it looks like a 1/X^n curve that continues >> way below the cutof of the instrument. The seen peak in the extreme spectra >> is way to strange to be a normal peak, clearly an artefact of the >> filtering of the instrument. So, if this is not an artefact, what we are >> seeing can very well be something that is rare and the bulk of the >> show is perhaps a result of much lower energetic electrons if we assume that >> the brehmstrahlung is from a distribution of electrons with different >> speeds. This does however indicate unexplained high energy releases and is a >> clear signal of nuclear origin as stated. > > I think the entire spectrum is produced by nuclei. > Harry
