The paper is well known to myself (I’ve studied it extensively several months ago in regards to the new peaks), but it’s good to bring it up again. I’m a little surprised that no one here has realized that Holmlid/Olafsson have also reported the broad low energy spectrum in one of their recent papers. Ecco actually brought this up within a few minutes/seconds after displaying the Trace #7 anomaly. I know this paper is more encompassing than just a broad low energy background, but the truth is that there have been others that have reported electromagnetic radiation and I don’t think that MFMP ever denied that ... MFMP has just replicated it. Which is important (and the main part of their existence is to replicate the work leading to excess anomalous heat).
- Mark Jurich From: Stephen Cooke Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 1:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ? Great find Axil. Did you already forward it to MFMP? It's interesting that they use Boron as a neutron shield too. That might be important for them to know too. On 25 Feb 2016, at 05:25, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/2004/2004Focardi-EvidenceOfElectromagneticRadiation.pdf Evidence of electromagnetic radiation from Ni-H Systems This MFMP radiation observation is nothing new. On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: Where is the big surprise? I woke this morning with anticipation - expecting to see proof from MFMP of a 5 hour self-sustained reaction. Instead, we get graphs of modest gain at the noise level and radiation counts peaking in the few hundred per second – when we need to seeing a million times more - if the radiation does indeed relate to excess heat at kilowatt level. Yawn. Let’s hope there is much more forthcoming than this. What am I missing?
