Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Otherwise that would mean that there is no connection between excess heat > and radiation . . . > There is no correlation. In some cases they have been anti-correlated. Cells have produced radiation and neutrons, then heat and no radiation, then radiation again. If true, I suppose that means radiation somehow resembles incomplete combustion that produces smoke rather than an open flame.
Ed Storms thinks that radiation is a side effect of the cold fusion process that happens sometimes but not other times. He thinks the neutrons may be from fractofusion. There may be a causative connection between radiation and heat. Perhaps one causes the other, or there is a common cause. But there is no correlation and definitely no fixed ratio. That is unhelpful, but facts are facts, even when they frustrate the theorist. I do not think this is caused by inadequate instrumentation. - Jed
