If the plot of the radiation spectrum from a glow-tube reactor encased in
lead- turns out to be typical of bremsstrahlung of high speed electrons,
instead of gamma radiation, the following is presented as an interpretation.

"An Alternative to the Quark-Gluon Structure of the Proton" by William L.
Stubbs - which can explain, or partially explain, Holmlid's mysterious muon
results.
http://vixra.org/abs/1511.0191

Stubbs presents a new model of the proton by reanalyzing the SLAC proton and
deuteron F2 curves. He shows that the proton can be modeled accurately as
nine muons. [IMO - since this is quantum mechanical, there could be two
valid views both of which are correct, depending on circumstances]. 

Stubbs concludes that the deep inelastic scattering data supports a simpler
model of the proton than the standard quark-gluon model, at least for
explaining certain phenomena of proton disintegration. To counter one
objection: it is well known that muons and antimuons are completely stable
together below a threshold of acceleration, just like the quark and
antiquark coexist in every nucleus of matter. Antimuons operate to provide
the same functionality as gluons. Holmlid's detection of high levels of
muons some distance from his  reactor may provide experimental evidence of
such a situation.

BTW in muon decay, the electron is extremely fast and expected to have a
steep peak at 52 MeV which would provide massive bremsstrahlung in a lead
target, even (especially) in the situation of little or no excess heat seen
in the reactor itself. 

_____________________________________________
. The important part of the Hagelstein slides is for assessing what could be
happening in the glow-tube reactor, IF high energy radiation is seen in the
range of 2.7 MeV... this is an apparent target "signature" to look for, at
least when deuterium is the fuel (it would be a much different signature for
protium). If this signature should show itself in glow tube testing, it
would be a huge advancement in understanding. even if the counts are low
(they are expected to be low). 



Reply via email to