Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote: I just don't see how it's possible for Rossi to provide 'proof'. No one is > going to believe this report. >
That is not true. Lots of people will believe a good report. Heck, I am scheduled to give a lecture in Stockholm if it is a good report. I am fully prepared to believe it. The other speakers are a lot more impressive than me, and Mats says the symposium is sold out, so apparently many people are prepared to believe it. I am not as prepared to believe it now as I was when Mats proposed the symposium, because I.H. has apparently repudiated the report in advance. That makes me very nervous! I will not go unless Rossi issues a good report and I.H. goes along with it mostly. Not to say they have to agree 100%. I hope I can evaluate the report myself. If it is mostly calorimetry, I probably can. If it involves a lot of mass spectroscopy I shall have to trust other people's judgement. The more I try to learn about mass spec machines the less I seem to know. - Jed
