I suggested Mills should look for thrust also with a battery powered reactor on a beam balance, but my proposal is that drag would be easier to detect than thrust when comparing reaction time to counterbalances placed on the scale when the unit was running vs off. I also wrote to Shawyer about the Naudt’s paper wrt relativistic hydrogen – suggesting that his microwaves and cavity geometry could be the same process in reverse using microwave energy to create relativistic regions [someone suggested the rf may set up standing waves], I don’t think this effect would be as concentrated as a Casimir cavity but on a macro scale inside a resonant cavity the reflected paths persist, accumulating a slight spatial bias. IMHO the longer vacuum wavelengths said to be restricted inside a Casimir cavity still exist but dilate and contract such that they appear smaller from our perspective and there is a shallower larger reservoir outside the cavity where wavelengths dilate in the opposite direction –stretching instead of contracting to counterbalance the cavity. This could explain why we have claims of both accelerated and retarded radioactive decays but note the accelerated decays are always much more pronounced and easily detected.. Although the temporal axis is equally 90 degrees displaced from every spatial axis I think this biased segregation between acceleration and retardation may allow a loop hole for unbalancing reaction forces in a closed system to produce thrust. Fran From: Ron Kita [mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 10:00 AM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:E-Cat THrust....EmDrive
Greetings Vortex-L, I wonder if the term Ecat-Q is a mistake or something that I misssed: http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/04/04/now-thrust-from-the-e-cat/ Per aspera...Ad astra, Ron Kita, Chiralex, Doylestown PA
