1. Sverre Haslund April 5, 2016 at 3:01 AM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=86#comment-1168663>
Dear Andrea Can you confirm if the Rossi effect produce muons ? Warm regards, Sverre Haslund 2. Translate Andrea Rossi April 5, 2016 at 7:16 AM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=86#comment-1168783> Sverre Haslund: I can confirm that the so called Rossi effect does NOT produce muons. Warm Regards, A.R. On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Speaking of capturing a form of energy which is normally widely dispersed… > > An obvious question from those awaiting word on the year-long results from > Rossi is this: could there be a cross-connection between the ecat and the > Holmlid/Ólafsson findings of large muonic output? > > There could be. Rossi is not aware of the muon possibility, but he > reportedly uses similar reactants – nickel, potassium and hydrogen with > thermal triggering, whereas Holmlid uses iron, potassium and hydrogen with > laser triggering. > > But the big advantage to having the large structure of Rossi with tons of > metal inside of it and numerous separated reactors - is that more of the > ellusive muons will be captured locally in the metal and in adjoining > reactors - instead of dispersing away. Steel is actually a good way to > capture muons. Any single reactor will lose most of its muons, but can > capture a few from each of the other reactors in the array. In fact if the > COP is low, it is possible that most of the gain derives mostly from this > shared effect for muon capture. > ____________________________________________ > From: Robert Dorr > > Nicely done presentation. Well worth giving a look. > > > These are the same slides used by Ólafsson at the colloquium back in > October > at SRI, reported here: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105372.html > > Here is the easy link to the slides > https://goo.gl/Zlenbp > > However, even today – the majority of observers in LENR seems to gloss over > the main point – which is that although fusion can happen, the bulk of the > energy release is in the form of muons (aka meson chain) and is generally > lost to the reactor itself (since most of the energy ends up as neutrinos). > Even so, there is net gain. The implication is that if properly engineered, > the gain will be much higher. > > In short, “something is accidentally created,” which causes seemingly > impossible nuclear reactions (nucleon disintegration) and that something is > UDH or UDD – ultra dense hydrogen. George Miley used to call it IRH or > inverted Rydberg hydrogen. Now it is simply call UDH or DDL (deep Dirac > level). > > Ultra-dense hydrogen can be the source of all or part of Cold fusion LENR > related phenomena. Laser induced fusion in UDH is the most effective way to > see the results since it produces muons as the longest-lived species. This > is also known as the “meson chain reaction” and the lifetime is several > microseconds, so that most of the energy will be deposited as neutrinos > many > meters away from the reactor – up to hundreds of meters. > > >
