I don't think Penon's competency is an issue at all here.   Anyone can
measure 50x cop.

On Wednesday, April 6, 2016, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have been complaining that Penon seems incompetent. It is a little
> unfair for me to grouse without substantiating my complaints. Let me
> briefly describe why I am not impressed.
>
> The report is here:
>
> http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/105322688-Penon4-1.pdf
>
> As I wrote previously:
>
> "It says output was 2.5 ~ 3.7 kW, and input was 3.6 kW."
>
> That's a BIG PROBLEM. Red flag! If I did a study and came up with an
> answer somewhere between 2.5 and 3.7 kW I would not publish it. That is an
> absurdly wide error margin. Narrowing it down in this case is easy. It is
> trivial. You calibrate. You step the cell through 8 or 10 steps at power
> levels ranging from 4 to 8 kW. That range covers the lowest to the highest
> power levels you think the cell is producing.
>
> I also said:
>
> "I do not think much of the methodology. I recommend calibrations and the
> use of thermocouple to augment the IR camera."
>
> I just explained why calibrations are important. I do not see them in this
> report. A thermocouple to confirm the IR camera is essential.
>
> "I admit I have not looked as closely as I did to the Levi reports, but I
> am not impressed. . . ."
>
> When I saw that gigantic error margin I thought, "What the hell is going
> on? Why didn't he get a better answer than that?!?" Basically I tossed it
> aside after that.
>
> The method of using an IR camera is crude but it can be done reasonably
> well, with calibrations and a thermocouple and some other precautions. It
> is not a bad start. But I would follow up with flow calorimetry, probably
> air-flow rather than water.
>
> A person who screws up a test on this scale can probably screw up a
> megawatt test too. Measuring megawatts is harder than you might think. It
> is actually easier to measure, say, 100 W with confidence than it is to
> measure a megawatt.
>
>
> Jones Beene also got a bad impression from this report. Maybe he tell us
> his reasons.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to