Hi all Should have included this in the above text.
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg109304.html Source for what "Jed Said" My apologies. This head cold is slowing me down :) Kind Regards walker On 14 April 2016 at 17:42, Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > Should have included this in the above text. > > Source for what "Jed Said" > > My apologies. > > Kind Regards walker > > On 14 April 2016 at 17:40, Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> In reply to Jed >> >> "... as I said. I.H. says >> >> they disagree with the report. They say there is no heat. That makes the >> report valueless. I trust I.H.'s expertise in calorimetry more than I trust >> Penon's." >> >> 1) Who at I.H. said this? >> 2) Who is the expert at IH on Calorimetry that you trust so much, that you >> accept their credentials? >> 3) How did this "expert" physically perform their tests? >> 4) How many days of the Test running did they have access to the plant? >> 5) When did they decide that according to their calorimetry that the plant >> was not working? >> 6) What are their qualifications? >> 7) Can you point me to a nuclear plant they worked on? >> 8) Can you point me to a report on LENR they have done in the past? >> >> Just the beginning of questioning your assertions. >> >> Kind Regards walker >> >> >> On 14 April 2016 at 16:34, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On another point; and by way of admonishment. If you are going to >>>> report something in the future state the source and quote what they say, >>>> otherwise you will find yourself entrapped again and once again having to >>>> back-pedal the fantasy. >>>> >>> >>> EVERY DAMN THING I SAID can be confirmed in the press releases and legal >>> filing. I pointed to these sources again, and again and again. >>> >>> LOOK HERE Ian!!! You are free to disagree with me. You can say that in >>> your opinion I have misinterpreted the press releases, or I do not >>> understand what the legal papers said about the 3 people who made the >>> evaluation. You can say that for thus and such reason, you think Rossi is >>> right that the machine is producing 80 times input, and the I.H. experts >>> must be wrong. That would all be fine. But DO NOT accuse me of hiding my >>> sources of information when I have repeatedly listed them here. That is >>> rude and it is against the rules. It is damned annoying. >>> >>> I don't mind being told I am wrong, but I resent it when you ignore what >>> I say, and accuse me of saying things I did not say, and doing things I did >>> not do. Stick to the facts, please. >>> >>> - Jed >>> >>> >> >
