Bob,

 

Here is more detail with a lot of reference which I am trying to wade through 
-- but you may find easier to navigate.

 

https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Strong_gravitational_constant

 

Obviously – if there were a solid case for this proposition, it would have 
gotten traction many years ago in the Ivory Towers, and Dufour would be better 
known in the broader field of Physics. 

 

Maybe he is way ahead of his time?

 

 

From: Bob Higgins 

 

After having read Dufour's paper, it appears that it is complete hypothesis on 
the basis of the fact that the other forces seem to converge in magnitude at a 
sub-nuclear scale - so why shouldn't gravitation?  He presents no apparent data 
that his hypothesis has any basis.  Gravitation would have to change radically 
from the 100 micron scale to the 1 fermi scale.  While possible, it would be 
nice to have some real evidence.  It would seem like it would create a 
measurable change in the lines of hydrogen as predicted by the Dirac equation 
because this nonlinear gravity is not accounted in the Dirac equation (we know 
that the Schrodinger values are off for lack of inclusion of special 
relativity).

 

Jones Beene wrote:

One other thought about Dufour’s hypothesis of a VERY SIZEABLE INCREASE OF 
GRAVITATION AT PICOMETER DISTANCE (on the order of Coulomb repulsion). This 
provides the effective pressure, on the order of hundreds of gigapascals, which 
is required for the known version of metallic hydrogen. The denser version is 
merely a further step and not unexpected if gravity operates this way.

 
<http://www.iscmns.org/asti06/J-DUFOUR%20-%20ASTI%20PRESENTATION%20-%202006.pdf>
 http://www.iscmns.org/asti06/J-DUFOUR%20-%20ASTI%20PRESENTATION%20-%202006.pdf

Ten years ago, Durour is talking about a model with several binding energies 
for hydrogen in the range of several hundred eV and actually mentions the value 
of 650 eV which Holmlid settles on. No one paid much attention then.

But Dufour goes further to imply that LENR does not need nuclear reactions if 
“picochemistry” involves any kind of asymmetry since the chemical energy level 
is so great. That would open a Pandora’s box which apparently he wishes to 
avoid, so the details of how picochemistry would ultimately be powered (ZPE ?) 
are missing. In so doing, he left open the door for Holmlid to get most of the 
credit… but LH deserves it. He has taken a huge risk, published tirelessly - 
and could come out of it with a big prize.

 

Reply via email to