Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: When a test is designed, a test plan is generated that defines what the > test is going to do and how it is going to do it in detail. Both parties > look at the test plan and sign off on that plan. > > This I.H. test plan should had the test procedures defined in detail which > includes how energy production was to be determined. . . . >
You attached this to the message about Jim Dunn. That had nothing to do with I.H. That was with NASA. Maybe you just attached it to the end of the thread . . . Anyway, there were disagreements about the protocol. I do not know anything about the contract or what the arrangements were. I was hoping the differences would be resolved but apparently they were not. That is what the March 10 announcement meant. As I said, when I read it, I thought: "the roof has fallen in; it's over." - Jed
