*as anything other than getting thints straight 2016-05-18 0:23 GMT-03:00 Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>:
> That the company was a shell was known to both parties. So, I cannot see > this as anything as IH and Rossi trying to get things straight. The only > way I see sense out of this it is that the shell company hired people in an > attempt of doing a double party test. The hired people would not know that > they were working for a third party issue and neither that it was a cold > fusion experiment. > > 2016-05-18 0:16 GMT-03:00 Eric Walker <[email protected]>: > >> >> Would it make sense for Penon to have had the ability to bar Leonardo's >> access to the industrial installation of a shell company set up by Rossi's >> lawyer to hide a genuine customer? >> >> -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
