a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: Jed "As I said, there is clear evidence of that: Rossi refused to let > anyone see the customer site. You have that from Rossi himself." > > AA. It seems this was the agreement written by IH before the test began. >
1. Rossi himself in the interview said that the I.H. expert insisted upon seeing the customer side. Surely you realize that this is a reasonable request, and that any expert would insist on it. Agreement or no agreement, Rossi should have acquiesced. It would have instantly proven his case. It would instantly resolve all doubts. There is no rational reason to deny this request. 2. Whatever they agreed to, it is common sense to alter an agreement in response to a reasonable request. I cannot imagine a more reasonable request than this, or one that would better serve Rossi's own purposes -- assuming he is honest and he actually has 1 MW. Opening the customer site would have as many advantages to Rossi as to I.H. It makes no sense to enslave yourself to an agreement when it can be improved to everyone's benefit. 3. Rossi is not a reliable source of information. You should not believe his blog or his assertions about agreements. He often lies. He lied about me, blatantly, years before I said anything particularly bad about him in public, other than the fact that he refused to let me visit and measure the temperature and flow rate. 4. Apply some common sense. Ask yourself: what other reason would Rossi have to refuse admittance, other than the fact that there is no 1 MW machine, and no ventilation system or other means of getting rid of the waste heat? Can you propose ANY reason why an honest person would hesitate to open the door? - Jed