a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: No. that is not what I said or meant. To repeat it, why wouldn't IH have > told the ERV that his proposal for instrumentation wouldn't be satisfactory > before the test started? >
They did. > IF they accepted it, it's no good complaining later. > They didn't accept it. No one would. > Further, we only have Jed's secondhand word for it that is was improper. > Incorrect. You have their motion to dismiss. That's what it says: ". . . departing from the purported test plan, ignoring inoperable reactors, relying on flawed measurements, and using unsuitable measuring devices." > > I need to see what was actually used before jumping to conclusions. > I have already seen what was actually used, so I am not jumping to conclusions. I suggest you wait and see before taking sides. I think you have jumped to conclusions. > To keep on stating that Rossi stopped them is a red herring. > He said he did! You don't even believe him??? - Jed
