I wrote:
And Jed Rothwell responded
2. CO2 is the big target at the moment. When we switch to hydrogen-fired
cars, how long do you bet it will take before there is a big "green" push to
limit H2O vapor emissions?
This suggestion (made by someone else) is ridiculous. It is a comic
book caricature of environmentalism.
One of the Vortexians made this suggestion, tongue in cheek.
Their next strategy will be to limit manmade thermo emissions. I
just heard that manmade gas emissions account for only two percent
of the total.
Where did you hear this? It seems unlikely, because in the first
world, fossil fuel energy generation produces twice as much carbon
dioxide as plant growth absorbs.
I have a friend who says that he hopes that our efforts don't meet
with any success, because of man made thermo suggestions. I decided
to make another tongue in cheek remark about it.
I suggest you stop spreading rumors about environmentalism, and try
to stick to critiquing actual statements made by real
environmentalists, rather than a strawman version.
One of the interviewees on C to C AM was talking about under ocean
volcanos, which he asserted were contributing more CO2 98% more than
human activity. I have heard that the Sun is putting out more energy.
According to Hal Lindsey, space.com has confirmed this. IMHO the two
factors should at least be considered before you get your undies in a
bundle about human activity causing global warming.
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
