I have to come back to this. This isn't looking good for Mills, and it
couldn't have come at a worse time, too. For the past year or so, Mills
has been approaching the end of his work, and hence, the end of his
funding. These people, whoever they are, aren't keeping him funded for
nothing. They expect him to deliver something tangible at some point,
and that point was fast approaching, since there was nothing left for
him to do with the SunCell. However, now if he's discovered an even
GREATER source of energy, by orders of magnitude, then he can lobby for
funding for another 20 years.
To me, this really makes him look bad. If he's legitimate, he needs to
push this new discovery aside, and get something out as soon as possible
to maintain any kind of credibility.
Craig
On 06/17/2016 04:06 PM, Craig Haynie wrote:
This is discouraging. What makes Mills special is that he:
1) Discovered something unusual.
2) Developed a theory to explain the phenomenon.
3) Spent 25 years working from his theory to develop his understanding
of this phenomenon.
It's because he was working from theory which made his progress
credible. He either really had discovered something, and was able to
exploit it, or he was a complete fraud, since if his theory is
worthless, then he could never have developed all of his work.
Now, if his theory can no longer explain the phenomenon, then this
means that he has either a) discovered ANOTHER amazing phenomenon, or
b) has a discredited theory which seriously makes me question anything
he's done.
His theory has always had problems, and always had a lot of criticism.
I don't doubt there may be holes in it which need to be filled --
perhaps a lot of holes -- but I am at a loss as to how he could have
discovered another amazing energy source without using theory.
Craig
On 06/17/2016 03:57 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
From the quote, that is a conclusion that is now coming out of BLP.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Craig Haynie
<cchayniepub...@gmail.com <mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Axil, are you saying that Mills' theory, which he has used to
develop this process, has now failed him and can no longer
explain it?
Craig
On 06/17/2016 03:38 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
R, Mills has alway asserted that the energy that he sees in
his experiments were based on CHEMICAL processes which are
driven by the particular characteristics of the hydrino
theory. There always has been a correspondence between the
small amount of energy produced by LENR experiments and the
small amounts of energy produced by hydrinos.
In this latest SunCell experiment, R. Mills is seeing huge
quantities of excess power produced in these reactor
meltdowns, in the megawatt range. There is no way that such
huge amounts of power can be produced by chemical means. This
implies that the hydrino is no longer the cause of the excess
energy seen in these meltdowns. Something else is going on.
Mills must now explain where all this energy is coming from
if it cannot be produced by chemical reactions. X-rays are
being generated with energies far in excess of any electrical
input voltages. What produces these X-rays?
BLP states:
Proof of a new energy source is provided by two otherwise
inexplicable observations: (i) The formation of a high-energy
hydrogen plasma in the absence of any input electrical power,
the nonexistence of any energy releasing chemistry with this
fuel, and the further impossibility of known chemistry of
this high energy. (ii) The emission of soft X-ray radiation
at a voltage far less than that of the light energy produced
and the inability of any known chemistry to release such high
energy.