I previously observed the coincidental similarity between the difference in photonic thrust and Shawyer thrust and the Q of the cavity - let me propose how a connection might exist.
According to Don Hotson (deceased), the ether is composed of epos (shrunken, neutral, electron-positron orbital pairs) that can be polarized. This provides the displace-able element needed in Maxwell's equations (without something to displace, Maxwell's assumptions fail). They also resolve the wave particle duality that stimulated all of the wasted formulation in quantum mechanics (I say wasted because, while it works, it is an unnecessarily painful formulation of the problem). So, if the vacuum is not empty, then there is something there that may be affected by the field enhanced by the Q of the resonator. Epos are tiny and neutral, but polarizable. They would pass easily through the metal resonator. Could there be some acceleration of epos caused by the device? If that were possible, then it could provide an effect proportional to the field and hence Q-proportional due to the field enhancement by Q. Bob On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *From:* Eric Walker > > Bob Higgins wrote: > > But, photonic leakage still doesn't explain the measured Shawyer EM drive > thrust. > > If this is true, then I like the anisotropic neutrino explanation that has > been floated here sometime back. Presumably the neutrinos would come from > electron capture (or possibly beta decay). > > Eric, > > A simpler explanation could be this: entangled photons couple better (to > the vacuum) than does the same flux of un-entangled photons. > > The analogy would be this: ice-treads couple better to ice than ice-skates. > The ratio probably exceeds the 100,000:1 shortfall of the Shawyer. > >
