OK , I will give you opportunity to discus what you told with the flowmeter industry.
Why are you mixing here backflow when you well know that it is possible only at very small flows, not in an industrial plant. Was backflow in the 1MW plant? You are speaking about deliberately inflating results 10 times how would you do this say with Rossi's flowmeter? In most langiuages a dozen is 60 divided by 5 OK, where is the dozen of methods And yes, you are using nasty and dirty rhetotrical tricks in aq very primitive mode. peter On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I was not babbling about the impossibility of making errors with a >> flowmeter I have told exactly that your statement: >> >> "*"Anyone knowledgeable about flowmeters can tell you a dozen ways to >> make the answer 10 times too large."* >> >> *is false and offensive etc. It is not about errors it is about >> manipulating results- inflating readings.* >> > > Dekalion manipulated results and inflated reading using one of the > techniques described in this guide. I am sure they did this deliberately. > > The guide is meant to teach people how to avoid mistakes, but it can just > as easily be used as a guide for cheating. I think it is likely Rossi & > Penon used a similar guide to cheat. Either that, or they are monumentally > stupid, and they happened to pick the wrong flow meter and use it the wrong > way, and that just happened to give the answer they were looking for. > > > >> *Please abstain from using dirty rhetorical tricks.. * >> > > Rhetorical tricks have nothing to do with this. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
