Che, I agree with you but that was about a hundred years ago. That was how communism got foothold. Now the problem is more about how we have developed a new class of royalist - the politicians and their bureaucratic slaves. I grow up in a country with a very pro-socialistic government. That took away from the working class. After some real fiascoes in handling pension funds the country has emerged as perhaps one of the most desirable places to live in (based on public polls). There is a need for balance. I think the growth of the economy in many previous undeveloped countries are a good thing and has nothing to do with type of idealism. (See China - most progress is developed where communism loosened the the idealistic grip and allowed for private initiative. That should tell everyone that private initiative can create progress. Government or any organization is incapable to create anything only people can create result. That is by definition. In my opinion it would be better that we had a more flexible society than we have in most countries I have experience from.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear Che, >> >> Very probably e both have a simplified opinion/impression of each other. >> Have you read for example: >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2011/02/sue-ellen-principle-and-kaltwasser.html >> ? >> >> You have tarted with aggressive attacks and insinuations, I was very >> angry for your POV re real socialism/communism, you have not demonstrated >> real >> knowledge, now globalism is the new destructive form of idealism. >> I am ready to discuss with you sine ira et studio bout these problems. >> In private. >> Try to be rational nd unprejudiced and have empathy and deep >> understanding for the experience of hundreds of millions captive and >> oppressed in Stalinism (again a simplified concept) >> >> Peter >> > > Imperialist propagandists just love what your type dishes out, Gluck -- > but the rest of the Planet worries instead about the LONG, long history of > Capitalist enslavement, OK..? Only middle-class types in the NATO West and > their masters obsess about us 'stealing' 'their' property. > > Speaking of leaving 'egos out' of matters... just stick to Cold Fusion. > However, every time I happen to see you slandering the long history of > working-class struggle against Capitalist exploitation -- I *will* say > something. > > > > > > >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Che, >>>> >>>> I have sent you in North Korea for re-education and it seems you are >>>> back too early.How could you manage to go through the border? >>>> Or the comrades hve found you are not worth to be converted in a New >>>> Man? >>>> Than sorry for you! >>>> peter >>>> >>> >>> It is a shame that your stalinist experiences -- especially the more >>> bizarre ones you suffered under Ceausescu -- have warped your mind about >>> many things. >>> >>> Redeem yourself: stick to Cold Fusion. (And stop rambling so much on >>> your blog.) >>> >>> >>> >>> (P.S.: just because I use the name 'Che', doesn't make me what you >>> assume me to be. For that matter: I wonder how many Romanians are sick of >>> the failed experiment of 'Capitalist freedom' in their country now...) >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > >
