A brief comment regarding the Dufour et al article at:
<http://www.iscmns.org/siena05/Dufour.doc>
I notice the Electron Induced Nuclear Reactions (EINR) model was
dismissed (on page 4 top) on the basis of COE. However, COE in the
form of signatures is the very issue at hand and thus not a valid
reason to dismiss anything. No one seems to get the notion that if
energy can be borrowed from the vacuum it can be returned. If
tunneling electron catalyzed fusion occurs, the resulting nucleus has
returned much of the energy to the vacuum.
Horace Heffner
