On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bob Higgins wrote: … no outcome is going to release useful information to > the LENR community…. Eric Walker wrote: If the matter goes to trial and > additional exhibits become available through discovery, those of use who > have been following Rossi for several years will obtain information of a > kind and quality that Rossi would never have voluntarily parted with…. > > Don’t hold your breath, Eric. Wouldn’t it be useless information anyway? Or > is there a working E-Cat, somewhere in the universe? AFAIK, there is no > solid evidence that AR has demonstrated thermal gain in a scientific > manner. Ever. > I don't disagree with you. By saying information from the court case "will helpful for understanding how things got to this point," I'm thinking more in sociological terms. What led people to accept such a low bar for evidence? Why are a few holdouts still so enamored of Rossi? This stuff may be old hat to people who have been watching this field for years, but it's still interesting to me. And also, when you've invested a lot of time in following a story, it's still nice to know what actually happened. Eric
