A.ashfield, first of all notice you are a solitary voice in defending Rossi. You are really really hard headed. Not sure why you don't understand that Rossi=scammer is the simplest explanation and this hypothesis (almost a theory now) can explain all the pieces of the puzzle and put them together as a whole.
It is a known fact the scientists that tested Rossi contraption had no real control of the experiment. Scientists are not trained to spot scams, they assume they are dealing with genuine natural phenomena. And if they are restricted in inspecting significant parts of an experiment that makes things even more complicated. They can try to extrapolate the missing information but that is based on the assumption there is no trickery. There are many notorious cases of scientists being fooled by scammers (see Uri Geller for example). Only when a trained magician like Amazing Randi intervened Geller was exposed (many scientists said he was real). You will need a magician with some training in engineering to find out where the trick that Rossi is using is. But again unless the magician had full access to the apparatus and all the steps of the procedure even this observer would fail to determine if Rossi cheated. It is simply the entire story as a whole that seems beyond any reasonable doubt to indicates Rossi has nothing and simply bullshitting all along. Only few blind people like you cannot see that. It is annoying and sad. Giovanni On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:28 AM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > A test was performed by Prof Levi not using steam but the critics didn't > believe that either. Rossi was right when he forecast only sale of > commercial working units would end the doubts. > > "Rossi and Levi have since conducted a longer test of the ECat, > at the University of Bologna on February 10. The ECat was run for 18 hours > this time. Also, a much higher flow rate was used, to keep the cooling > water from vaporizing. This oice was made in response to some of the > critiques of > colleagues; it makes moot concerns about dry steam." > > ref http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/IE96Rossi.pdf > > > pjvannoorden Sun, 14 Aug 2016 04:00:06 -0700 > > I just looked on vortex and saw that the Rossi story isnt over yet..... > I always wondered from the start why Rossi didnt increase the flowrate of > the > water in the Ecat in order to end all discussions about the reality of the > effect. > >
