New Scientists just gets lots wrong and keeps repeating its mistakes ad 
 New Scientist: "Back in the 1860s, James Clerk Maxwell was melding electricity 
and magnetism into one unified theory of electromagnetism. But however he 
sliced the equations, they only made sense if light travelled through space at 
the same constant speed, regardless of the speed of its source. This is odd. If 
someone fires a bullet from a moving car, to a bystander the bullet travels at 
the sum of its speed and the car’s speed. Yet when 20 years later US physicists 
Albert Michelson and Edward Morley were looking for the luminiferous ether, a 
medium supposed to carry light, they reached the same conclusion: however you 
look at it, the speed of light is a constant."
John Norton: "The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an 
emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE."


    On Thursday, 22 September 2016, 23:08, Jones Beene <> 

 #yiv5817438683 #yiv5817438683 -- _filtered #yiv5817438683 
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv5817438683 
{font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv5817438683 
#yiv5817438683 p.yiv5817438683MsoNormal, #yiv5817438683 
li.yiv5817438683MsoNormal, #yiv5817438683 div.yiv5817438683MsoNormal 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv5817438683 a:link, 
#yiv5817438683 span.yiv5817438683MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5817438683 a:visited, #yiv5817438683 
span.yiv5817438683EmailStyle17 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv5817438683 
.yiv5817438683MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv5817438683 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 
1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv5817438683 div.yiv5817438683WordSection1 {}#yiv5817438683 Two 
slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this
      From: Alain Sepeda

An article on LENR, relative to  U.S. House of Representatives committee on 
armed services  with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open 
    I launched a post for debate on 
  I seen an occasion to spread informations


Reply via email to