Photons also acquire mass when they combine to create a positron and an electron--the opposite of annihilation.
Hatt's massification processes is describe in his theory as involving enough electrons and positrons to form protons and neutrons--around 1800 for neutrons and one less electron for protons. This massification process may require high energy gamma rays--energy equivalent to something greater than the the mass of a proton or neutron. It would be interesting to look for a paucity of photons in a star generation spectrum equivalent to one half the mass of a proton or something a little less to account for energy loss of the photons as they leave a massive structure. Hatt's theory also accounts for the mass of muons by the same basic massification process. Thus there should also be a paucity of high energy photons corresponding to their mass. Such an observation would reveal the stability of matter with respect to antimatter in star formation. I believe Hatt's theory accounts for this favored massification process. Do the photons captured by the Rydberg matter also become massive anti matter--positrons or other anti-leptons? Bob Cook ________________________________ From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 1:31 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ah hah.... dark matter internal to common matter http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/335/4/L94.full Magnetic field in the intracluster medium: Rydberg matter with almost free electrons Metalized hydrides can be a candidate for Dark matter. The important contributor to mass is photons captured in a superconductor. These photons aquire mass. On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Bob and Russ-- Have you ever seen a number for the effective energy associated with one quanta of angular momentum? Are those "fairy particles" merely spin quanta of energy only separated from their off spring photons, brother gravitons and kissing cousins magnitons and electons? It seems to me that the poor quarks and their associates, gluons, are just "fairy fairies" IMHO with other fairies all the way down as some think. Phillipe Hatt's theory about the the sexuality of leptons--electrons and positrons at least--gives a better prediction of the nature of protons and neutrons and other "heavy particles" than the "quark fairy tale" and does not involve "fairies". The issue of sexuality of course is still a mystery yet to become apparent as we grow older. (: -) Bob Cook ________________________________ From: Bob Higgins <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Saturday, Octobr 1, 2016 9:26 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ah hah.... dark matter internal to common matter They are proposing MOND as a new/old solution. The trouble is that MOND has adjustable parameters and does not explain why this occurs, only provides a means to fit an equation to the modification of Newtonian mechanics. Michael McCulloch wrote a book about his MiHsC theory that derives from first hypothesis how inertial mass (Mi) can differ from gravitational mass. The prediction seems to fit pretty well with the data without adjustable parameters - a very nice plus. But, after reading his book (Physics from the Edge), I decided that what he proposed violated causality. I wrote to him about it, and he agreed that it did violate causality but he was working on an explanation for that. Perhaps his equations are right, but for the wrong reason. On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Russ George <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: A new series of observations on the behavior of 153 galaxies defies the usual dark matter suspect being some mystery rogue fairy particle scampering about the universe in numbers many times that of common matter yet unobservable, what a common human mythological fantasy transformed into “science dogma.” https://www.insidescience.org/news/new-findings-muddy-understanding-dark-matter?source=realclearscience.com More plausible it seems is that internal to common matter, inside that marvelous and mysterious bag of quarks that is everything, there are some bits that have eluded our mundane/egotistical observational methods which the collective faithful have steadfastly proclaimed as near perfect. Believe us they say, we are the learned majority not merely lemmings, this is the way it is, and by the way if you would like to buy a nice bridge I can get you one at a deep discount or perhaps you’d rather a super-conducting super collider which comes with my pension plan. There are so many forbidden mysteries are served so well by the notion that we haven’t invented every theory and tool that is possible to invent.
