Jones--
You should review the scope of NRC's authority. IMHO NRC regulates "by products" of nuclear fission reactors, but not tritium produced by other methods. Thus radioactive materials naturally occurring that are not fissile materials are not regulated. Tritium resulting from LENR is not regulated by NRC IMHO. However a device producing neutrons may very well be regulated by NRC, since it could be considered a device for the production of fissile materials--for example, Pu-239 from U-238 or U-233 from Th-232. With this in mind I would be surprised to see an invention in the unclassified arena that involves production of neutrons. A wise LENR inventor should avoid producing neutrons by his invention. Bob Cook ________________________________ From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2016 7:30 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Tritium generation in LENR Speaking of the Sun-Cell and its early commercialization... Tritium generation is the gold standard of proof in LENR. There is nothing else which comes close to the certainty afforded by finding a reaction which produces tritium at lower energy input. But the experiment itself becomes radioactive and rather dangerous since tritium is hydrophilic and carcinogenic -- and is therefore seldom performed today. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was created to ensure the safe use of radioactive materials for civilian purposes. The NRC regulates all commercial uses of nuclear materials, even the small amounts of tritium (micrograms) used in nuclear medicine. The signature of tritium is a well-known beta decay with a short and predictable half-life which cannot happen naturally, and also is easy to detect with inexpensive meters. Discovery of the tritium signature is thus rock-solid proof of a nuclear reaction. The signal has been reported many times in peer reviewed experiments from the early days. These experiments have been generally ignored by the mainstream. It may surprise many LENR advocates to learn that one of the first claimants of tritium production in light water electrolysis was none other than Randell Mills, who published his results in the highly regarded Fusion Technology Magazine over twenty-four years ago - long before there was even a company called Blacklight Power. Mills of course would love to have the world ignore this detail about tritium today, since he wants nothing to do with anything that smacks of "nuclear" and wishes to portray the Sun Cell as completely non-nuclear. Yet the possibility that tritium occurs as an inherent result of the Mills effect will not be erased until he permits an independent observer to monitor the experiment for tritium (which has not happened). Any level of secrecy creates a problem for eventual certification of the Sun Cell - if it should bring the results into the purview of the NRC. BTW - the legacy of tritium discovery by Mills lives on in US Patent 6,024,935 - where the inventor himself quotes many varied and different sources to support the discovery of tritium in nickel-light water electrolysis (curiously ignoring Claytor and LANL) in favor of: 1) Notoya, "Tritium Generation . . . Nickel Electrodes", Fusion Technology, vol. 26. 2) Oka, et. al., "D2O-fueled fusion power reactor using electromagnetically induced...Deuterium-tritium reactions-- Fusion Technology, vol. 16, No. 2, Sep. 1989, pp. 263-267. 3) Srinivasan, et. al., "Tritium and Excess Heat Generation during Electrolysis of Aqueous Solutions of Alkali Salts with Nickel Cathode", 3rd Annual Conference on Cold Fusion. 4) Chien, et. al., "On an Electrode . . . Tritium and Helium", J. Electroanal Chem., 1992, pp. 189-212. 5) Storms, et. al., "Electroyltic Tritium Production", Fusion Technology, vol. 17, Jul. 1990, pp. 680-695.
