----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: S. Jones makes claims about 9/11 attack
Jones Beene wrote:
John Coviello wrote:
H.V: Do buildings that suffer structural failure collapse so
quickly and cleanly? If not, then the events of 9/11 require
alternative explanations..
Yes...if the buildings had been designed to be demolished.
You switched me with John Coviello. ;-)
Yes, but of course it does not *have to be* part of the design,
necessarily, but it would be interesting to hear if it was indeed
part of it. That may end up being a red herring - and there are
too many of those floating around - such that it becomes a big
distraction away from the ONE salient fact mentioned by Harry and
many others. Steve Jones, a t least in this endeavor, is a giant
leap more diligent (and brave) then people are giving him credit
for.
In the end this was almost a "free fall" - such as happens in
controlled demolition and that cannot be presumed to be the result
of pure coincidence, since no other building of this type has EVER
gone down from fire, or in a similar fashion. But two other
points - one scientific validate that suspicion.
A documentary on TV said the WTC twin towers were designed differently
from other tall steel boxes. The outer walls formed a square tube-like
structure. It may be no other buildings quite like the twin towers has
ever
suffered a fire.
The statement above applies only to WTC-1 and WTC-2, both of which were hit
by planes and obviously suffered some structural damage (even if there are
questions about if the fires were actually hot enough to melt steel and
cause the buildings to fall). However, the statement above does not apply
to WTC-7, which was not hit by any planes, was not designed differently from
other tall steel boxes (it was just a regular building), and did not have
raging fires (even though fire has never brought down a steel framed
building anyway). So, what caused WTC-7 to collapse on the afternoon of
9/11/01 remains a myster, and I believe it is fair to entertain alternative
explanations.
<SNIP>
