Alain I have the same experience about China.(France and US). Isn't a good idea neglect political labels. There is none providing a 'best' result or worse for that matter. The culture with which they are implemented is more of an important factor. Eliminating energy pro lens would be a step to reduce tension in the world. LENR is an important issue. Another important factor would be to eliminate the bureaucrats supported by various political and cultural dogma. I think that can happen when we find out that life is not a zero-sum game. Just the opposite. Lennart
On Dec 9, 2016 04:09, "Alain Sepeda" <alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote: > the mentality of Chinese people is very capitalist at local level, and > also more family than individual oriented. > However at the political level they seems more imperial, and abroad they > tolerate the local authorities, even local criminality as long as it is not > impairing business... > It is a mix we have problem to understand in the West. > In a way I see a similar misunderstanding between French culture > considering US way. It is hard to see in france that US solidarity is more > group/community driven than state driven, even if things are changing (and > many disagree, in both countries). > > The "policy mix" of a culture is surprising for another culture. > In China "capitalism" is more popular in poling than in france and even in > USA. > > french are more negative than people of irak about their future... > > Note that China may not be globally capitalist, more Mercantilist or > Colbertist as we say in france (Crony too)... Not so different from US-way > in foreign trade, with huge state implication in business to protect > installed players. > However both US and China (more China) unlike France, have a very strong > local free capitalism with huge competition. > > 2016-12-08 22:26 GMT+01:00 Chris Zell <chrisz...@wetmtv.com>: > >> China is the nation to watch as to Communism. I understand that it sees >> capitalist methods as useful on a path to Communism and has never given up >> on this idea. If they can hold back corruption, they may continue with >> the Party being dominant over all corporate forces (unlike the US in which >> it is the other way around). >> >> >> >> Communism is mostly about developing and maintaining enough resources to >> be easily shared. If abundance can be created technologically, there could >> be a withering away of the state. Think about what free energy, future 3-D >> printing and digital currencies could accomplish. We already have an >> enormous resource of free information at our fingertips – that frustrates >> centralized media and governance. Who knows what follows next? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
