Spark generator from charged particles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8GlzUjYazs
Muons do the same job as neutrons but better through they are very hard to detect. On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Few rad detectors show neutrons, mostly they are quite large, the flux > might be very low hence the need for a time integrating detector, pretty > much the only available is a bubble detector, they are very inexpensive and > idiot proof to read, one needs a pair of them one in the inside shirt > pocket, they are the size of a fountain pen, one left outside the room, > just count the bubbles, if more inside there are neutrons afoot. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 11:05 AM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:The other "heavy water" > > Well, that is a bit too obvious. > > There is little doubt that by now someone has hidden and used a radiation > detector of some kind during a demo, given the circumstances. > Mills realized this possibility from day one - and has taken precautions > > The possible conclusions include: > > 1) The reaction produces almost no neutrons, even secondary neutrons, even > when natural deuterium is in the water. This is the preferred scenario from > Mills perspective. > > 2) Water is used in the demo which is depleted in deuterium thus no > neutrons are seen > > 3) Neutron shielding has been used but is not mentioned by Mills... and it > has worked > > 4) The party detecting the radiation has kept quiet about it. > > > Russ George wrote: > > > Easily testable, just have someone attending a Mills demo carry an > integrating neutron detector such as a bubble detector. > > >
