FYI, these papers are free to download. -------------- A simple explanation of the nonappearance of physical gluons and quarks
J Hansson Canadian Journal of Physics, 2002, 80(9): 1093-1097, 10.1139/p02-034 ABSTRACT We show that the nonappearance of gluons and quarks as physical particles is a rigorous and automatic result of the full, i.e., nonperturbative, nonabelian nature of the color interaction in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). This makes it, in general, impossible to describe the color field as a collection of elementary quanta (gluons). Neither can a quark be an elementary quantum of the quark field, as the color field of which it is the source is itself a source, making isolated noninteracting quarks, crucial for a physical particle interpretation, impossible. In geometrical language, the impossibility of quarks and gluons as physical elementary particles arises due to the fact that the color Yang–Mills space does not have a constant trivial curvature. In QCD, the particles "gluons" and "quarks" are merely artifacts of an approximation method (the perturbative expansion) and are simply absent in the exact theory. This also coincides with the empirical, experimental evidence. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/p02-034 -------------- Comment on "A simple explanation of the nonappearance of physical gluons and quarks" Andreas Aste http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/p03-056 --------------- Reply to the comment by A. Aste on "A simple explanation of the nonappearance of physical gluons and quarks" Johan Hansson http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/p03-072 ---------------- Harry On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 1:47 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Russ— > > > > You say “data speak to me”. I agree with that idea. The high energy > electron scattering experiments on protons and neutrons that W. Stubbs has > evaluated are pretty good evidence for constituents of those particles not > being primary particles of fractional charges, quarks. I have been aware > of the idea of quarks since the early 1970’s, and my skepticism of their > reality has only increased over time. Philippe Hatt’s predictions of the > magnetic moments and mass of protons and neutrons is consistent with > measured properties of these particles. His model considers positrons and > electrons make up these particles without the quark soup of the Standard > Model. His predictions go beyond the accuracy of current experiments and, > thus allow for better model confirmation in the future. > > > > Getting the Nobel prize for a nifty empirical model is note worthy. > That quark model with all its arbitrary constants and assumptions > contradicts the concept of reality from my viewpoint. > > > > I tend to believe that the electron charge associated with that primary > particle is real , since I have measured that charge myself to 4 or 5 > significant figures. However, there is no reasonable model of reality > linking the assumed fractional charge of a quark to the measured unit > charge of an electron or positron. > > > > Bob > > > > > > *From: *Russ George <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Friday, January 6, 2017 6:29 PM > *To: *[email protected] > *Subject: *RE: [Vo]:Quark soup life is like a box of chocolates, you > never knowwhat you are going to get ;) > > > > Well my ‘ready kilowatt cold fusion’ system is near to hand, and not being > such a nervous pussy as to worry about being grabbed that I substitute LENR > for the term ‘cold fusion’ that’s the better moniker… even with President > Trump amongst us. Of course you know that the only real way to understand > science is to adhere to the admonition “data speak to me.” That speaking > data always confides to anyone listening about IP. I am far less of a > mercurial professor than Martin Fleischman, but the older I get the more I > am beginning to understand his POV. > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, January 6, 2017 12:13 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Quark soup life is like a box of chocolates, you > never know what you are going to get ;) > > > > Russ, > > > > *I am excited to hear that you are on the verge of developing a high > powered LERN system that might show the generation of muons as a reaction > byproduct. If it is not an imposition on your good nature, could you try to > detect and verify these muons by placing a sheet of silver or other metal > over the geiger counter as you have described doing in previous posts. A > report back to vortex about the results of such a test would be great if > the report does not violate your IP position.* > > > > *Also wishing huge well deserved success in this and all you do. * > > *Axil* > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Russ George <[email protected]> wrote: > > Peter, > > > > You are always most welcome to echo my blog posts. The New Year has begun > and after being in hibernation for the past month or so I am beginning to > be reinvigorated. There is too much to do to deliver several ocean pasture > restorations this year and get my danged ‘dusty plasma ready kilowatt’ > heater into production. Only a few bugs left to squash. By the way you’ll > be interested to know that hot gas phase NiD, aka Quarks, make 4He as do > similar AgD devices, aka Millquarks! > > > > Cold Fusing as always > > [image: cid:[email protected]][image: > cid:[email protected]][image: > cid:[email protected]] > > > > Russ George > > Atom-ecology.russgeorge.net > > > > > > > > *From:* Peter Gluck [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, January 6, 2017 11:42 AM > *To:* VORTEX > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Quark soup life is like a box of chocolates, you > never know what you are going to get ;) > > > > it is my pleasure to sif=gnal your fine paper. > > Bob is my good friend too like you, no problem if you have different > opinions. > > best wishes, > > Peter > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Russ George <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bob Cook and I disagree about the reality of ‘quarks’, having had the good > fortune of being tutored many times on quarks by a dear friend who won the > Nobel Prize for their discovery I favour their existence, Bob does not. > They are very convenient in understanding the ecology of cold fusion. Now > whether nucleons exist or not and where is another question. Here’s my post > on the topic http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2017/01/05/quark-gazpacho/ > > > > > > -- > > Dr. Peter Gluck > > Cluj, Romania > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > > >
