I don’t think anyone is really speaking of “target” nuclei in cold fusion. That’s been off the table since the beginning. It’s just semantics as to how to describe the ‘many bodies.’ Most assuredly there are moving reactive/fusing ‘particles’ the evidence for that is clear. Those particles are moving in as yet an ill-defined fashion.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 7:24 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation Robin— I think it’s a mistake to consider a coherent system with target nuclei. Target nuclei make sense in two or three body reactions, but not in a solid state coherent system with many bodies coupled together with a single energy and spin state at any given instant. Bob Cook Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 7:00 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:22:23 -0800: Hi, >Something smelts here. :) Yes, I guess Al might have been lost through vaporization, but K increased 3 fold. Since they used two separate bulbs, any differences could also be a simple result of variance in manufacture. Also creation of a plasma in the bulb could result in migration of elements due to temperature gradients, resulting in localized concentrations. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >[mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:12 PM >To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation > >In reply to a.ashfield's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:15:42 -0500: >Hi, >[snip] >>Microwave Induced Nuclear Transmutation in Compact Flourescent Lamps >>https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WUlh4c3dJWlh5Rjg/view >> >> From MFMP facebook. > >They talk a lot about the minor changes in P, Si, S, but make no mention of >the large change in K, Al. > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
