Regarded LeClair's credibility. The Mosier-Boss and Forsley experiment lends credence to the LeClair claims of neutron production when the metalized material is accelerated into matter. The acceleration of the NAE in encased in pladium produces hot fusion effects as witnessed by the generation of neutrons only when lithium is used as a catalyst.
http://pieeconomics.blogspot.com/p/cavitation-radiation.html "Dog-One wrote: Since I have the floor for a moment, let me say this much: I probably should have kept my big mouth shut. What I saw convinced me the LeClair Effect has merit. The big fat BUT in my opinion is this is clearly a poor way to convert Matter to Energy. And the form of energy you get isn't easily useable. Plus, you have the joy of waste product. I'll bet James Griggs has no idea just how dangerous his Hydrosonic Pumps actually are." Another interesting revelation from the Mosier-Boss and Forsley experiment is that the cratering effect is only seen when a lithium catalyst was used in the experiment. The pressure related metallized material formation process associated with lithium requires at least 4 times LESS pressure than that needed to metallize hydrogen. On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > The credibility issue with LeClair is something he must address if he > wants positive recognition. As with AR, there is an overabundance of > enticing talk but little reliable data, no peer reviewed publication, no > independent replication, and lots of evasiveness. YouTube has spawned the > era of fake news and also fake science... and this looks like an instance > of fake science. > > Back to the Subject Heading: A "eutectic mist" for maximum surface area. > That is enticing because surface area is deemed to be a key parameter in > LENR and all the more so if there is to be increased coupling between > photons and metals for SPP. A eutectic would be important to lower the > boiling point of some metals in order to permit a mist, but does the mist > revert to "dust"? Nickel apparently has few eutectic possibilities and > tends to agglomerate so this may not apply. Zinc and silver are candidates > and are both Mills catalysts. > > There has been informed opinion about the so-called "dusty plasma" being > an ideal medium but it is unclear if the dusty plasma is related to a > eutectic mist. The Egely experiment - with his dusty carbon plasma appeared > in "Infinite Energy" years ago (issue 102) and then faded from view. As we > have mentioned before, implementing a new understanding of plasmonics (in > the context of SPP) could bring a version of dusty plasma (or eutectic > mist) back into contention as a preferred way to get anomalous gain at low > power input, since photon penetration should be many orders of magnitude > deeper than a porous solid. > > But I doubt that LeClair will be playing a useful role in that development. > Axil Axil wrote: > > More... > > http://www.waterconf.org/upload/LeClair%20Abstract%20WC2012.pdf > > The Water Crystal > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce3vqlIGxvk > > At 34:00 into this video show, Mark LeClair, the president and driving > force behind Nanospire begins his presentation describing the production of > fusion using cavitation. > > >
