Cancer is IMO easily treated.

But the treatments don't lead to patented medicine or expensive treatments.

I have zero fear of cancer.

John

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

> John Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> http://www.australiannationalreview.com/cancer-research-
>> fraud-claims-nobel-prize-winner/
>>
>>
> This article is titled:
>
> "Most cancer research is a fraud, claims Nobel Prize Winner"
>
> I think that title overstates what the article says. I would title it:
>
> "Most cancer research is a dead end"
>
> . . . or "most cancer research is futile, or barking up the wrong tree."
> That is also the case with most cold fusion research. Also with most
> product development, programming languages, new grocery store food snack
> offerings, and just about every other attempt at innovation. Most of the
> time, most new ideas fail. That's unfortunate, but it is not fraud.
>
> On the other hand, there is also fraud. Also lots of sloppy research that
> should not pass peer-review, but it does. I have no way to judge whether it
> is "mostly" fraud and slop, or mostly an honest mistake. In cold fusion, as
> far as I know, most mistakes are honest.
>
> It is impossible to know an experiment is a mistake until you have done it.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to