Hi Horace,
Makes sense, won't work
Why? Because our nation has a fuel use addiction. It has taken 60 full years for society to become addicted. Fuel use excesses over this length of time become so ingrained that culture is actually modified. This habit began forming at the end of WW2. Prior to WW2, only cities had electric power, few owned autos. We went to bed at dark. No amount of reasoning can change the culture of excessive use of energy. City lights remain on all night. Auto traffic does not cease all night. Attempting to reconcile this fact with my childhood experience where we had no electricity or auto is impossible. However , there is a solution to most addictions. Remove the addictive substance.The cold turkey method cannot be permitted, so the addiction will continue until it becomes prohibitively expensive due to shortages of supply or no more money is available to purchase. It appears society has chosen a combination of the two solutions. I deliberately left out the obvious solution, self discipline and imagineering for pending crisis because no society has ever been capable of acting in their own best interest. That leaves the individual to look out for himself.... which is exactly what is taking place.

The solution becomes like the joke about the different ways a switchman can prevent a railroad collision. When all remedies are exhausted, call your sister to come see the wreck.
Richard
----- Original Message ----- From: "Horace Heffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 6:41 PM
Subject: An Energy Business Idea


One of the problems with developing and selling wind and solar energy is the variability of these sources. Typically, alternative energy companies are small and horizontally organized. Many solar and wind companies have failed, in part due to the inability to market power that is not dependably deliverable, and in part due to variability in government support.

The variability in delivery problem may in part be solved by use of improved energy storage and transportation means. See:

http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/HotCold.pdf
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/BigPicture.pdf

However, much of the reliable delivery problem can be immediately solved simply through effective business strategy and business synergies. The solution is a vertical integration approach. By diversifying energy sources, the reliability of delivery is increased, and great technical synergy is possible. By owning energy transmission systems, the delivery strategy can be optimized with reduced exposure to external manipulative schemes.

Wind companies should, during build-up of capacity, also acquire or build conventional generating capacity for the purpose of smoothing energy deliveries. Small methane fueled jet engine powered electric plants might be a viable way to build this capacity. Energy delivery reliability can also be improved by buying or building alternative power sources, like solar, or biofuel generating plants. Merger with existing power generating utilities may make sense, and should be facilitated and expedited by regulatory commissions when application is made.

Wind farms can readily be used to store energy in the form of liquified air. This capacity, combined with heat storage plus waste heat from a nearby peak load generating facility, can dramatically increase the efficiency of that facility, as well as the energy storage capability of the overall plant. There are many synergies that can exploit existing technology through vertical integration.

A large new source of reliable power, deliverable in the form electricity, can readily be absorbed. Home heating can easily and cheaply be upgraded and augmented by electric heaters and utility managed network based control systems that optimize use of the generating, transmission and distribution systems. Electric vehicle technology is close to being deliverable in a big way.

The remaining problem, variability in government support, can only be attacked by reaching the critical mass required to support adequate lobbying.

A solid business plan and big financing may be the key to quickly cracking the energy nut. Alternatively, a mutually formed business consortium or even merger of alternative energy producers and manufacturers might be achieved to take advantage of the dramatic and obvious economies of scale and synergies available. The profit potential dwarfs most alternatives.

Horace Heffner




Reply via email to