Fran,
It is difficult to reconcile dense hydrogen with a relativistic
electron. In rereading Naudts paper just now, it seems as if he could be
describing the initial redundant ground state of Mills, as if there were
only one level, and not deeper levels.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0507193&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm0LGJAvqlA8ud47yUQ-TK3j7BYALA&nossl=1&oi=scholarr
... it seems like Naudts is more focused on a whiteboard quest to find a
workable solution to the Klein-Gordon equation than to model the reality
of what Holmlid seems to have found at extreme densities, or Mayer and
others have solved for more moderate densities. There is a solution
which has a low-lying eigenstate which Naudts (not necessarily Mills)
calls the hydrino state, as if there was only one, but with no square
integrable wavefunction. Not sure how that could relate to an extremely
dense state, other than one might suspect that UDH is almost synonymous
with wavefunction collapse - and even if Naudts is broader than that -
how can one reconcile an "energy depleted" electron with a relativistic
electron ?
Roarty, Francis X wrote:
My dear friend Jones, Let me beat this horse one more time with Naudts
suggestion that the hydrino and by extension, dense hydrogen, are all
relativistic forms of hydrogen and your trepidation about suggesting
time dilation is the only single effect that explains all the
anomalies from the EM drive to modified half lives of radioactive gas
when catalyzed ...As for below absolute zero temperatures this goes
away if the observation is not in the same frame as the UDD.. I may be
extending Naudts claims to the limit but would suggest the temp never
goes below absolute zero for the local nano observer collocated in the
same frame as the UDD. Fran -----Original Message-----
