>From what is described in the response to the application of an intense high voltage electrostatic field observed by experimenters, the bullet seems to be more responsive to demagnetization when a weak magnetic field is applied to it. The electrostatic field exposure might affect the nanostructure of the magnetic domain boundaries and/or the nanoparticles that comprise the composition of the magnet material.
The experimenter describes behavior of the bubble that forms at the center of the bullet moves around like a liquid when an external magnetic field is applied to that region of the bullet. This liquid like behavior only occurs after the application of the electrostatic field and is a pertinent feature thereafter. Place some magnetic plastic on your active bullet to visualize the behavior of its magnetic field at its center. Then expose that area to a weak magnetic field from a refrigerator magnet. Do the same test on a unprocessed bullet that can be gotten from the marketplace. Check to see if the bubble at the center of that unprocessed bullet behaves in the same way...as a liquid. If the behavior of the magnets are different then a point of comparison is now possible. To understand what is going on at the nano level of that bubble needs some specialized sensitive magnetic sensor equipment I suspect. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Brian Ahern <[email protected]> wrote: > Can anyone describe how this applies to the Manelas billet. It is > ferromagnetic and highly resistive. Here is what I have learned from my > decade accompanying Keith Johnson (MIT prof. retired 1997) > > > 1.Magnetism arise from the alignment of spins. > > > 2.The spin is quantized and the electrons are in orbitals that can be > predicted. > > > 3.Some ferromagnets have spins that are associated with loose bonding > (shallow potential wells) > > > 4. Shallow wells enable a relaxation of the Born-Oppenheimer condition > (Electron motion is independent of ion movement.) > > > 5. Ferromagnetism with shallow potential wells allows for interaction > between spin alignment and vibrational modes. > > > 6. This condition allows for cooling with the application of pulses to > interplay with the vibrational modes and spin alignment. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, May 5, 2017 11:52 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:The Kerr effect > > > > > Axil, > > > > Those references are quite instructive. > > > > The idea of power transfer vectors as a coupling mechanism is a new > concept for me, I hope that this is being taught in undergraduate physics > chemistry and EE courses. > > > > The magnetic field and spin energy transfer all closely connected IMHO. > Engineering coherent systems in the solid state to allow the coupling to > the nuclear part of the potential energy of the system is the crux of > achieving LENR+. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > *From: *Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Saturday, April 29, 2017 10:04 AM > *To: *vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect > > > > The following reference actually shows the monopole magnetic field produce > by the polariton. If you cannot understand that picture, I cannot do more. > > > > The Ni/H reactor produces the same effect using polariton vortexes that > form on the surface of nickel micro particles and in clusters of lithium > hydride nanoparticles. There is also the condensation of these polariton > solitons that provide super-radiance as another powerful amplification > mechanism. > > > > see figure 2 for a picture of the monopole magnetic beam > > > > Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles > > > > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf > > > > Nanoparticles produce Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) which are the > optical cavities that produce that magnetic fields that result in meson > emission. Sorry if the line of connections is long, Here is how > nanoparticles produce EMF amplification of light. > > > > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf > > > > Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale > > > > Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of > the more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro > particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows > how the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is > concentrated through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy > between a vortex and a gear. Like a funnel, a large particle gathers the > energy from a wave of EMF far larger than its diameter, In the case of the > Rossi system, this type particle is the 5 micron nickel particle. > > > > https://vimeo.com/36691535 > > > > > > This large particle produces a relatively huge vortex. Other particles of > various sizes accumulate around the nickel particle. Each of these > particles produce a vortex proportional to the size of the particle. These > vortexes fit together like gears where the large vortex provides a large > amount of power, and the other smaller vortexes provide a gear train that > speeds up the rotation rate of the smaller gears down the train. > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkxXheV748U > > > > Finally, the smallest vortexes associated with hydrogen crystals, spin at > high rates of speed providing large EMF power amplification. > > The take away is that a large spread of particles sizes produced within an > aggregation of particles generates the most powerful EMF amplification > effects. This fact explaines why the “secret sauce” effect provides such a > large EMF power amplification result. These alkali metal hydrides supply > the intermediatly sized gears that allows the large nickel gears to > transfer their vast store of energy with little loss to the smallest > hydrogen based gears down a smoothly running vortex power transmission > chain. > > I venture to say that there is randomness associated with this particle > aggregation process that enables a sort of natural selection where the > most effective dust pile configurations provide the most EMF > amplification. When there are an abundance of particles, the chances are > good that some of these piles will be LENR capable. That is to say, when > there are a large number of particles, the chances are good that some of > their aggregates will produce EMF amplication great enough to catalyze > nuclear effects. > > > > There is also a certain lifetime associated with particle formation. > Particle piles are constantly falling apart. These particle aggregates must > be constantly rebuilt to maintain a sustained reaction rate. > > > > The SunCell is an example of dusty plasma based LENR where silver vapor > condenses into nanoparticles that produce the LERN reaction. > > > > > > >
