50% chance of emerging entropic branes bringing rain today... On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The standard model is wrong. Gravity fits into a LENR based theory where > ALL the forces of nature are Entropic. All the fundamental forces > including gravity are not fundamental but instead they all emerge like > gravity from entanglement. > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:49 AM, CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You know what Axil. The Entropic Gravity theory was one of the few >> theories that made me step back and made me do a double take and change my >> view of how gravity works. It's not a coincidence that gravity just >> doesn't fit into standard model. If gravity is due to entropic forces of >> an occupied space partition, it makes sense that gravity is not part of the >> standard model. There is no need for gravitinos or mediators. Relativity >> and space-time curvature all fit nicely into that model. >> >> If you do physics and have never read the papers on Entropic Gravity, I >> highly recommend you do. It may very well change your whole view on the >> universe. >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Here is the description of entropic force and why there is not dark >>> matter particle,,,hydrino. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropic_gravity >>> >>> LENR will prove this theory and change science and cosmology. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> When particles are entangled, they are connected to each other by a >>>> wormhole that circumvents normal space time correlations. >>>> >>>> see >>>> >>>> https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/context/new-einstein-equati >>>> on-wormholes-quantum-gravity >>>> >>>> Space time is now believed to be connected through long range >>>> entanglement. The forces of nature are emergent from entanglement. This is >>>> why BECs are important in LENR because the nature of these fundamental >>>> forces are affected by the BEC. These forces are called entropic forces. >>>> >>>> Without a BEC, LENR produces radioactive isotopes. With a BEC, LENR >>>> produces stable isotopes. The BEC increases the activity of the electroweak >>>> force. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:49 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Mon, 12 Jun 2017 >>>>> 00:19:54 >>>>> +0000: >>>>> Hi Bob, >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >Robin— >>>>> >It’s the last sentence in the introduction that is pertinent. It >>>>> makes the point that the BEC >>>>> >Can be described by a wave function as if it were a single particle. >>>>> >>>>> Not exactly "as if". You missed the word "parallel". IOW the two wave >>>>> functions >>>>> share some properties in common, but not necessarily all. In fact he >>>>> says >>>>> "collective" properties, IOW those properties which can be shared by a >>>>> collection. That doesn't include position. >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >You suggest that a coherent system state as described by a wave >>>>> function does include a specification of probable . relative location of >>>>> charge centers and/or magnetic dipole centers. What are the parameters >>>>> of >>>>> the system state that you believe the paper considers are pertinent? >>>>> >>>>> For that I would have to read the whole paper, and I am not so >>>>> inclined at the >>>>> moment. But if you find something to support your position, and post >>>>> it here, >>>>> I'll be happy to discuss it with you. >>>>> [snip] >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Robin van Spaandonk >>>>> >>>>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
