Looks like Rossi has gotten over the trial quickly.

   1. JPR
   July 8, 2017 at 7:00 AM
   <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=252#comment-1283432>

   Update?
   2. Andrea Rossi
   July 8, 2017 at 2:55 PM
   <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=252#comment-1283447>

   JPR:
   After the tests of today with my QuarkX I was probably the happiest man
   in the world.
   Warm Regards,
   A.R.


On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

> According to Abd... "All claims dropped on both sides. It is as if the
> suit was never filed. All parties bear their own costs. The action of the
> Agreement was the consent of counsel to settlement without any court order
> other than dismissal, which is final."
>
> No agreements were included... so unless they present something otherwise
> in a joint statement, IH retains the original E-Cat License. No money
> changes hands.
>
> As for the future of the litigants, it looks like IH paid about $11
> million ++ for a License which according to them is worthless insofar as it
> was never shown to produce excess heat. Add to that the attorney fees and
> we see why many observers consider IH to be the big loser in this.
>
> That assumes the IP is really worthless, but it may have value in a
> surprising way, even if Rossi could never make it work. Here is the granted
> patent, and there are a number of applications not granted.
>
> https://www.google.com/patents/US9115913
>
> Darden raised much more than his losses on the Rossi fiasco and there is a
> small chance that he could make lemonade out of the Rossi lemons, using
> some of it. An interesting development in all of this will be the course
> that IH takes from here on with the remaining money. They are known to have
> been funding others in LENR all along.
>
> Of course IH could abandon the field altogether, but maybe they have a
> vision which transcends Rossigate. Possibly the best thing that could
> happen is for Randell Mills to demonstrate strong gain in that SunCell
> device. If it turns out that Mills device is arguably nuclear - it will not
> be covered by the hydrino IP. There have already been "inside" rumors that
> recent delays in the "Mills' Roadshow" are due to radioactivity showing up.
> This is expected in LENR but not in hydrino-tech and it could change the IP
> landscape.
>
> Footnote. Rossi's IP covers "Group 10 catalysts" which are nickel,
> palladium and platinum. It does not cover silver, which is being used by
> Mills and is Group 11. Silver is easily activated and perhaps it is
> activated by dense hydrogen. Mills' IP would not cover nuclear reactions.
> This puts him in a bind. If silver is required, but becomes activated, then
> there is an IP storm brewing.
>
> If I were advising Darden, it would be to look at quickly expanding the IP
> to fill the gap which exists when Mills can no longer hide the
> radioactivity of the SunCell.
>
>
>

Reply via email to