It suddenly struck me one day that the reputed Aspden effect might be a sign of
free energy – in that it might hint that torque could be added and subtracted
from a rotating mass so as to result in a net gain.
If this is true, then we would expect to see various devices pop up, from time
to time, that claim overunity involving an intermittent or off balance use of
rotational inertia……….and what do we see?
Things such as Bedini, Schauberger (liquid and air), Rotoverters, flywheels
with deliberately slipping belts, Linevich, claims by Kanarev and a large
proportion of the ‘tin foil hat’ devices reported on Rex Research.
The Wallace inventions (‘kinemassic effect’) claimed a direct link with half
integer spin materials. Could something have been overlooked here? Sorry if
I’m a little off topic ( but maybe not as much as you might think)
From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 10:35 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex
From: Chris Zell<mailto:chrisz...@wetmtv.com>
* OK, here’s my current puzzlement: is it possible that physics has ignored
a free energy effect within rotational inertia?
It is possible that a gainful effect has been overlooked, and that is why it is
fun to figure out which of these vids are faked. Rotational anomalies are
probably the closest to showing a valid anomaly but most of the videos are
fakes. Hopefully the one in thousand will show up soon. There are spatial
avenues for augmenting inertia – such as the DCE (dynamical Casimir effect).
However, since no one has been able to demonstrate a device that shows true
gain … unequivocally, and which has been fully replicated, the Laws of
Thermodynamics are still on the books (but they are not true Laws and will
fizzle away IF adequate scientific proof arrives, even if the gain is slight).