See the English translation from French at half way through the item.
MFMP folks may have an interest for a duplication of the Meyer device. Note
that Meyer suggests that resonant energy stimulation of the electronic
structure may be accomplished by fractional input signals with respect to the
primary electronic resonance of the copper induction coils.
Tuned high frequency stimulated EM emission devices may also work to achieve
resonant energy input.
I would suspect that a close look at the iron or copper isotopic concentration
would make sense out of the excess energy reported for the Meyer device with
the presence of nucleons with lower binding energy.
This appears to be a LENR with coupling to the copper lattice electrons and
creation of an electric field that induces a classical current—an intrinsic
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 7:06:06 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Phonon–Nuclear Coupling
Going back to the general principle of stimulating the element iron with waves
of another type and/or frequency, in order to cause actual isotope
transmutation - there is another entry: the Meyer-Mace device which received a
flurry of attention 20 years ago, was patented and then all but disappeared.
In this device an iron rod was said to produce x-rays of ~20 keV from NRM
stimulation. In contrast, the Hagelstein paper talks about x-rays of 14.4 keV
being derived from ultrasonic stimulation.
In addition, John Wallace who is an expert in ferrous materials has performed a
similar experiment using iron which is apparently gainful. [no citation
available at the moment but I have read the paper]
Bottom line, given the credentials of Wallace and Hagelstein - this cannot
easily be categorized as fringe physics, even though the thought of bringing
about nuclear changes with low energy input makes it seem suspect in the eyes
of the mainstream.