I agree with the idea of adding a dimension to Holmlid’s laser setup—may be
expensive however, since lasers with the appropriate frequency may be necessary
to get good coupling. Given known quadrupole magnetic moments in various data
sources for the stable (and unstable} Ni nucleons, picking design parameters
for the lasers may be easy.
The objective should be to stimulate a target Ni nucleus to a meta stable
energy spin state, which then is allowed to decay—given the lattice
coupling---to a new lower potential energy spin state.
This scheme of transmutation of radioactive waste was proposed as an
alternative in the DOE’s nuclear waste management EIS of the mid 1970’s—1976 as
I recall. It was one of several different options considered at that time.
However, it was dismissed because the necessary technology was not available to
accomplish the desired stimulation the radioactive waste. This situation has
changed with subsequent development of lasers of most any frequency desired.
Two lasers, if in resonance, may provide magnetic quadrupole coupling necessary
to unlock the potential energy of Ni nucleons of a coherent lattice, just as in
the Letts-Cravens Pd system.
Conserving linear momentum is not an issue, since the system is not stimulated
with high linear momentum particles, as is the case in simple two-body nuclear
interactions. Thus ionizing radiation is absent, as is the case with LENR.
Only angular momentum (and total energy) are conserved in an LENR process IMHO.
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 7:50 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio
I should have mentioned that another wrinkle on superwaves could employ light
waves - the so-called Letts-Cravens effect where laser irradiation of two
lasers impinge on a loaded lattice.
AFAIK – Holmlid has always used only one laser.
Perhaps he should superwave it ?
Another wrinkle would be RF + laser. Or 2xRF + laser? Or 2xRF + 2xlaser?
A known mechanism for wave amplification in rigid structures is called “energy
localization” which can be a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a
lattice. When stimulated with two waveforms at different frequencies, a
paradigm shift can be engineered on the vibrational modes of bound particles
(protons in a lattice). Nuclear reactions can happen in rare cases, but even
without them thermal gain is possible at the nanoscale in blatant violation to
the Laws or Thermodynamics. This is essentially proved but scaling up to useful
levels is not proved.
In the Schrödinger equation you can find the term for quantum kinetic energy as
the second derivative of the wave function for place. The closer the particle
is confined, the greater the curvature of its wave function and the greater is
its quantum kinetic energy (the energy localization). It can be a power law
In simpler terms, Quantum kinetic energy is the kinetic energy with which bound
protons move through the lattice - and this energy can be nonlinear wrt input.
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that the closer the particle is
confined, the smaller its freedom of movement Δx and thus - the more violent it
wriggles back and forth, and the greater is his Δp . Intersecting waveforms
can provide the increased confinement and the resultant gain is the theory
behind the “superwave”.
RE: GRANTED US patent which cites the Dardik superwave patent
It is no coincidence that Energetics, Violante, McKubre, Chauvin, Rossi,
Brillouin, Kimmel group, etc, all employed similar interfering and
self-amplifying RF waveforms as input power.
Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, the Euro Patent from Dardik
(El-Boher et al) provides a known mechanism for wave power amplification
-“energy localization” which is a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a
lattice. Generally the COP is limited to a low range using this mechanism but
it can be gainful without nuclear reactions. It is also difficult to scale up.