Brian— I have been indicating that phonic spin energy in orbital atomic electronic structures are likely coupled via magnetic fields to nuclear spin states with appropriate EM resonant conditions. See about 50% of my comments on Vortex-l over the last 3 years. The coupling allows transfer of nuclear potential energy to phonic kinetic energy (lattice heat) consistent with a coherent system’s increase of entropy.
It explains LENR given an absence of real particles with high linear momentum/kinetic energy. LENR is devoid of normal nuclear reactions involving two or three particle interactions.) It depends upon a coherent system of many particles including electrons and nucleons and maybe some virtual particles as well. Bob Cook ________________________________ From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 3:13:22 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Arnaud, What do you fing interesting in the spin energy concept. I want to learn more about thisnew concept. ________________________________ From: Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM To: email@example.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni. From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35 To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR To clarify: Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization potential (the catalytic “hole”) 1) Molybdenum .07 2) Potassium .09 3) Rubidium .09 BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further from an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor. This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic fit. AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd onto Mu metal to optimize both goals. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- … which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has found for LENR was a Mu metal alloy. The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the most valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … using “ Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and the proprietary alloy in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/co-netic-sheet-and-foil<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcustommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com%2Fcategory%2Fco-netic-sheet-and-foil&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf7d515364ac8461fca8b08d559f18632%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636513816222874554&sdata=CHoxI7cS%2FGY0UNTkohjm5q7d4oMBEXM162zqHW1X%2BMQ%3D&reserved=0> The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key to the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg levels in the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it should be noted that Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to Mills theory of all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No other metal is as close to the precise value.