LENR can produce transmutations at a distance. Urutskoev verified this when he came up with his theory of how LENR produced the chernobyl meltdown. Muons might favor U238 fission over U235 fission. This is what makes LENR dangerous.
From Low-energy nuclear reactions and the leptonic monopole Georges Lochak*, Leonid Urutskoev** http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf For us, it is important that the transformation can also take place outside the plasma channel. This is a rather “unpleasant surprise,” because, probably, within several years, when the low-temperature transmutation will be studied in more detail, it would be rather easy to devise a facile and inexpensive process to enrich uranium. In view of the growth of terrorism all over the world, this outcome seems deplorable. On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > > > *From: *Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > > > > - I can not see how the Bose Condensation nature of ultra dense > material can support a chain reaction. The Condensate offloads its excess > energy through the production of muons not neutrons. Muons are not bad like > neutrons. Muons do not pump the Condensate, so there is no positive > feedback loop possible > > > > There are alternative scenarios for a feedback loop. One of the > possibilities does not involve uranium at all. Another would simply happen > so rapidly that most of the UDD is converted into helium before it can > change state. Since Holmlid does see some fusion, in addition to muons, it > is likely that the fusion part of the reaction could be optimized. > > > > If we accept that 105Pd is the active isotope of cold fusion - and that it > is converted into 107Ag in the main cold fusion reaction, which is one > interpretation of the recent Biberian finding (which triggered this posting > to begin with) then UDD is going to be gainful without being annihilated > and without the need of a laser. > > > > Also, imagine a large caliber bullet composed of fully loaded PdD. If a > spherical array of barrels is arranged around a depleted U core, what > happens when the core implodes? (given that we know that muons are > preferentially absorbed by U) > > > > Anyway, a hypothetical UDD explanation could combine Holmlid’s species > with P&F’s palladium lattice – so it would be a hybrid - and is open to > criticism on that account. The underlying fusion reaction should produce at > least 14 MeV. If engineered properly there would be chain reaction of sorts > (positive feedback from pressure, for sure) which is dependent on the > initial inventory of UDD. The yield could be one fourth as much as uranium > fission. > > > > Given how much the USA is hated in parts of the middle East, and how much > wealth there is - any of these nightmares becomes simply a matter of will > and can be countered by careful planning. We can only hope that our > government is taking the proper precautions. OTOH, a simple “dirty bomb” is > devastating enough and it can be argued that it will be the first thing > which is tried. > > > > It does not help to hide one’s head in the sand and opine that we should > not even discuss the possibilities. The easiest way for enemies of the US > to succeed is for experts (or even those on the fringe) not to be vocal and > aware of what technology is available and how it can be used. > > > > If UDD is real, then it may not be presently taken into account by those > who should be looking at all the risks. > > > > > > > > > > >
