The preferred catalyst of Holmlid for creation of dense hydrogen by surface 
contact is a commercial product known as “Shell 105”. It is mostly hematite – 
iron oxide, with potassium.

Iron oxide has a long history as a petrochemical catalyst and of course is very 
economical. Both iron, oxygen and potassium are also Mills’ catalysts, which 
lend credence to the belief that Holmlid and Mills are operating in the same 
arena and that the hydrino and UDH are different aspects of the same species.

The problem is that many experimenters who have tried to replicate have had no 
luck with iron oxide, but then Holmlid has recently revealed that the hematite 
catalyst is much more likely to work when “activated” by calcining. Mills too 
has trade secrets which are partially but not fully disclosed. In the end, the 
lack of replication of dense hydrogen gives the skeptics plenty of ammo. 

Even with heat treatment there are additional techniques to activate hematite 
which may be needed. This indicates that the variability of secondary 
processing of the catalyst is what is  keeping it from widespread use, AND that 
there is something unknown which is not yet fully appreciated. In fact, iron 
oxide had many forms and phases - and the field of petrochemical catalysis has 
itself been called borderline alchemy over its long history, due to economic 
priorities. This is Rossi’s background as well. Petrodragon was promoted to be 
a catalysis breakthrough of a similar type.

The above reasoning sets the table for the likelihood that there is a hidden 
and more active form of iron oxide which can be made via pre-activation (if one 
knew exactly how to do this optimally) but that its identity has been a mystery 
up until now - even to the ones who have occasional success. This is where the 
new material “hematene” comes in. 

Hematene is a newly discovered form of hematite… which may be the precise 
active ingredient for dense hydrogen instead of hematite. It has been there all 
alone in small amounts but not appreciated.

Here are two articles on hematene, which is basically a 2D phase with 
similarities to graphene, the most studied of all two-dimensional catalytic 
materials. The two-dimensional morphology of hematene is confirmed by 
transmission electron microscopy. Magnetic measurements together with density 
functional theory calculations confirm the ferromagnetic order in hematene 
while its parent form exhibits antiferromagnetic order. 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-018-0134-y

https://newatlas.com/hematene-2d-iron-material/55670/

The problem is that even with the new identification, it is not clear how to 
make or activate it from the cheap starting material in such a way as to 
guarantee success.


Reply via email to