Brian Ahern <[email protected]> wrote: This response is tedious and irrelevant. >
Tedious perhaps, but it has the not-least attractive quality of being right, whereas the N.H.E. was wrong, so I think it was relevant. > The surprising reality is that they were quibbling about milliwatt excess > power levels. > 300 to 460 milliwatts. 40,000 J/day. See p. 17: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanlettersfroa.pdf That's a lotta milliwatts! Any competent scientist could measure that after J. P. Joule showed how circa 1840. As you see, by the N.H.E. method, the result is impossible, whereas when you apply a reasonable heat transfer coefficient, they were getting a half-watt. - Jed
