Oops. should be 6 quarks and 6 antiquarks in the Standard Model - anyway, no
apparent problem AFAIK
From: Jones Beene
At least one of the researchers suggests the dark matter particle is related to
an antineutron. An antineutron is composed of 3 antiquarks.
There are 6 quarks, 3 of which are antiquarks in the Standard Model, no? Where
is the problem?
From: "[email protected]" Where did the model of “antiquarks”
come from; Is that your conjecture? The antiquark thesis would seem to
suggest that the Standard Model may be getting somemore primary particles to
add to its stable. A sterile antineutron may not be too sterile around
regular neutrons. The idea of mirror matter is a new one for me. Must be the
result of fake science. Bob Cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:
Jones Beene <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2018 7:34:17 AM
To: Vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection A
good case (but preliminary)is being made in several physics Labs around the
World, involving the characterization of a dark matter particle which is both
common and related to the neutron, but sterile and slightly lower in mass. In
fact, it appears that about 1% of any neutron beam from any neutron
generator(planned or unplanned) will consist of this particle, which seems to
oscillate back and forth (as with neutrino oscillation). It has been called an
X-particle, but it could actually be antimatter, or the equally exotic "mirror
matter". As an uncharged particle it does not normally annihilate with matter
but when it does, only muons are seen - never gamma photons. It is more like a
mirror image neutron than what we expect of antimatter, but it seems to consist
of antiquarks.
Of course, in the vastness of our Universe, there could be more than one kind
of dark matter, perhaps many varieties, and this may be only a small percentage
of all dark matter. It is surprising that the new particle seems to be
basically an antineutron. It is also possible that this particle is the same
one which appears as many of the forms of "dense hydrogen," such as UDH and
also the ultra low momentum neutron. In other words, we could finally be
getting close to identifying a unique dark matter particle which has been
notably responsible for some of the past anomalies lumped together as "cold
fusion". At least this is one broad interpretation of the research:
https://physicsworld.com/a/neutron-anomaly-might-point-to-dark-matter/
[1801.01124] Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly
This "second type of neutron" whether it is ultra low momentum or not, would be
largely indistinguishable from LENR dense hydrogen but with a variation in
lifetime. It would not be the exact UDH of Holmlid, but there are many theories
which are similar and it seems like a more accurate picture will emerge soon
involving electron orbital "shrinkage" which converts protons into a light
sterile neutron composed of antiquarks.
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
[1801.01124] Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly
| |
|
|
