I could learn about the structure of a watch by smashing it with a hammer but chances are I will damage or destroy some parts of the watch in the process.
Do high energy colliders really offer a window into the structure of matter or do they transform the very thing they are studying? Harry On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 10:49 AM Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > Krasznahorkay and others from the Hungarian Institute for Nuclear > Research, on a very limited budget, recently reaffirmed a spectacular > discovery made 4 years ago and partially validated by others. If true, > their findings could be complementary and perhaps even more important than > the Higgs. > > This prospect (fame) - in a way actually threatens the geniuses at CERN - > given the large disparity in funds employed. Thus the lack of enthusiasm > from that sector is evident and we can expect intransigence to continue - > plus an unwillingness to review own LHC data for confirmation - since it > should be there. > > The mystery finding is apparently best explained as a ~16.7 MeV neutral > particle -- not the dark photon, which was an early aim but "dark" > nevertheless (weakly interacting). It is yet to be named but could help > explain the results of Holmlid's experiments with laser irradiation of > dense deuterium - where muons were suspected but not proved. That work is > another earth-shaking discovery which is generally ignored by the > mainstream, and discovered on even less of a budget. > > On the off-chance that this Hungarian discovery proves correct and > explains Holmlid - here is suggested name for it, and a simple way to > validate the connection. The suggested name is the "Zsa boson" in honor of > another famous Hungarian. > > The data supposedly can be explained by a vector gauge boson that decays > to e+e− pairs. Others have suggested the new particle cannot be an X boson > which would mediate a fifth force. Yet there is one feature of interest > that is apparently agreed - that being the coupling, which is present to up > and down quarks AND electrons whereas proton coupling is suppressed. > > Thus a suggestion to Holmlid or replicators who are on a strict budget - > look for simple electron coupling at a distance. How? Well one lowest-cost > possibility with lots of "impact" so to speak would be simply to place a > fully charged ultra-capacitor in various positions around the target and > look for the expected explosion (being careful to provide adequate safety). > "Duck and cover," as we were taught in the fifties :-) > >
